My Experience with Wikipedia Article Deletion: When One Report Erased My Work

By: Me | Date: November 9, 2025

Have you ever experienced editing a Wikipedia article, saving it multiple times, and suddenly seeing everything disappear? That’s exactly what happened to me. I spent hours writing, researching, and editing a well-structured article — only to face repeated errors while saving. Then, one day, the article was gone completely.

Strange Errors Before the Deletion

While I was editing, I kept getting strange error messages every time I tried to save. I didn’t think much of it at first — maybe just a temporary glitch. But later, I realized those “errors” might have been signs that something unusual was happening behind the scenes.

One User, Two Reports

After checking the Wikipedia logs, I discovered that only one person had reported my article — not once, but twice. The first report was canceled and replaced with a new one. What surprised me even more was that the same person who made the report also participated in the deletion process.

The Deleted Article Reappears Elsewhere

Out of curiosity, I searched my deleted Wikipedia article title on Google. To my shock, I found a mirror version of my article hosted on a university website. Strangely, that university was the same place where both the reporter and the deleter were studying. That made me wonder — was this just a coincidence, or something more?

Questionable Quality Control

What frustrates me most is that many low-quality articles filled with weak references and personal Instagram links are still safe on Wikipedia. Meanwhile, my article — complete with credible references and professional structure — was removed without a fair review. It made me question the transparency and fairness of Wikipedia’s editorial process.

Reflections on Wikipedia’s Editing Community

Wikipedia is a great platform for sharing knowledge, but my experience exposed how fragile the system can be. When personal bias or small groups control reporting and deletion, it can discourage sincere contributors who want to improve content quality. I still believe in the value of open knowledge — but also believe the process should be more transparent and balanced.

Conclusion

Having your work deleted on Wikipedia without a proper reason is disappointing. However, it also reminded me that even in open platforms, there are hidden networks and power dynamics. My story is a reminder that fairness and accountability should always matter — even in the world’s largest encyclopedia.

---

Keywords: Wikipedia deletion, editing error, article removed, Wikipedia report abuse, online editing experience