Rabu, 03 Desember 2025

Smule a Toxic Platform Exposed - Part 3

Smule: A Toxic Platform Exposed - Part 3

Smule: A Toxic Platform Exposed - Part 3

Organized Bullying: A Business Model?

Smule’s negligence goes beyond mistakes—it has become a **systemic issue**. Bullies recycle fake accounts, manipulate communities, and spread lies without facing consequences. Meanwhile, real singers are silenced. Engagement is monetized, and chaos benefits the platform. In effect, organized bullying is allowed because it keeps users invested, while victims are driven away.

The platform selectively enforces rules. Predators may be removed immediately, but when it comes to harassment campaigns, smear tactics, or impersonation, Smule looks the other way. The discrepancy shows where the priorities lie: the brand is protected, but users are not.

The Cost of Silence

I lost years of recordings, collaborations, and community trust because Smule refused to act. The damage goes beyond lost content—it affects confidence, mental health, and the willingness to share creativity. Paying high subscription fees does not justify the lack of protection or fairness. Premium services should guarantee safety and respect, not expose users to harassment.

Many talented singers have left Smule, silenced by harassment and neglect. This is not a lack of talent—it is a loss of artistry due to a platform that rewards abusers instead of protecting artists.

Final Thoughts

Smule may look magical on the surface, but underneath lies a toxic environment where bullies thrive and victims are ignored. Organized harassment, fake accounts, and smear campaigns are real threats, and the platform’s silence enables them. Users must speak up, report abuse, and support each other to counter this negligence.

The community deserves better: transparency, real moderation, and respect for users’ mental health and creativity. Until Smule implements real protections, the platform remains unsafe, and talented singers will continue to be driven away.

Sharing my experience is not just a personal story—it’s a warning and a call to action. Smule must be held accountable, and the community must stand together to protect artists, creators, and users from the toxic practices allowed to flourish unchecked.

Smule a Toxic Platform Exposed - Part 2

Smule: A Toxic Platform Exposed - Part 2

Smule: A Toxic Platform Exposed - Part 2

Escalation and Community Manipulation

The harassment on Smule wasn’t random—it was **strategic and calculated**. When bullies couldn’t destroy me using fake accounts under my name, they escalated further. Hundreds of fake accounts were created under their own names, spreading lies that I was behind them. The intention was clear: manipulate the community, ruin my reputation, and isolate me from collaborators and friends.

Imagine waking up to dozens of accounts impersonating people, posting false accusations, and convincing the community that you are the troublemaker. Blocking these accounts does nothing—the damage is public and permanent. And Smule’s response? A repeated, unhelpful “just block them.”

Neglect of Users Over Brand Protection

Smule prioritizes its image over the safety of its users. Complaints are ignored, and victims are often dismissed as “overreacting” or “bots.” This culture protects abusers and discourages victims from speaking out. The platform allows organized bullying to continue for months—or even years—while publicly promoting itself as a “safe music community.”

The result is devastating. Users invest time, money, and creativity into the platform, only to see their mental health and reputations harmed. Subscription fees are high, yet the service fails to provide basic safety and moderation. Paying for a premium experience should include trust, security, and fairness, not exposure to harassment and smear campaigns.

The Psychological Toll

The bullying caused **enormous mental and emotional strain**. Being publicly defamed, watching fake accounts spread lies, and seeing friends misled takes a heavy toll. Victims experience stress, anxiety, and isolation. Many talented singers are forced to leave the app to protect themselves, silencing creativity and community growth.

Smule claims to celebrate music and community, but in reality, it fosters toxicity. Users who invest their hearts and voices are abandoned, while bullies often receive status and promotion. Some even become “Ambassadors,” a role that ironically rewards their abusive behavior.

Why Speaking Up is Crucial

Victims cannot rely on the platform for protection. Speaking up, documenting abuse, and supporting others who face harassment are the only ways to push back. The stories of victims show that Smule’s policies are insufficient and highlight the need for transparency, moderation, and real consequences for abusers.

This is why I’m sharing my experience. Smule must be held accountable for failing its users. The platform’s silence allows harassment to continue unchecked, forcing victims to bear the cost of its negligence.

Smule a Toxic Platform Exposed - Part 1

Smule: A Toxic Platform Exposed - Part 1

Smule: A Toxic Platform Exposed - Part 1

I used to love singing on Smule. It felt magical at first—sharing music, meeting people from around the world, and enjoying the creativity of a vibrant community. But all of that changed when I became the target of organized bullying. Fake accounts were created to impersonate me, harass me, and spread lies about me. It wasn’t random trolling—it was a coordinated attack, carefully planned to damage my reputation and isolate me from the community.

I reported these incidents repeatedly. I provided evidence, screenshots, and detailed explanations of what was happening. Each time, I received the same copy-paste replies. No real action. Meanwhile, the bullies continued their harassment unabated. I was eventually forced to step away from the app for almost two years, just to protect my mental health.

When I returned, the same bullies were still active, spreading lies and disrupting the community. Smule claims to be a fun and safe place, but the reality is that they protect their image, not their users. Victims are ignored, while abusers thrive unchecked.

From Fake Accounts to Reputation Smears

The harassment wasn’t limited to accounts impersonating me. When the bullies couldn’t destroy me with fake accounts created under my name, they escalated their tactics. They created hundreds of fake accounts using the bullies’ own names, then spread false stories claiming I was behind these accounts. This was a deliberate attempt to smear my reputation, turning the community against me.

Smule’s standard response? “Just block them.” But blocking is useless in this context. The damage wasn’t in private messages—it was public, affecting how others perceived me. Friends, collaborators, and even casual listeners were misled into thinking I was dishonest or disruptive. Blocking does not undo years of reputation damage, and yet Smule does nothing to intervene.

The subscription fees for Smule are high, yet the platform provides no real safety, moderation, or comfort. Paying hundreds of dollars for a service that exposes you to harassment and organized attacks is unacceptable. A premium subscription should include trust, protection, and fairness—but Smule fails to deliver.

Calculated Bullying, Not Random Trolling

The harassment began with personal jealousy. One user was envious because a man she liked sang with me. She told me not to duet with him, and I respected that boundary. But he joined my recordings independently. From there, the situation escalated. The jealous user created multiple fake accounts, impersonated me, and spread lies, orchestrating an entire campaign of bullying.

Smule’s marketing focuses on “community” and “safety,” but the reality is starkly different. Calling victims “psycho” or dismissing complaints as “bots” is a common response. Silence is their default moderation tool, and it allows organized harassment to continue unchecked.

For years, Smule has had opportunities to implement stronger protections: identity verification, IP bans for repeat offenders, and better reporting escalation. Yet they choose inaction. Chaos keeps users engaged, and engagement means profit. As a result, abusers recycle fake accounts while real talent is driven away. This isn’t just negligence—it’s a business model built on looking the other way.

Why Speaking Up Matters

Speaking up is crucial. Smule’s silence allows bullying to thrive. Victims are forced to navigate harassment alone, while the platform maintains a polished public image. Users pour years of work, creativity, and time into recordings, only to see their reputation damaged and their contributions ignored.

If you’ve experienced bullying or fake accounts on Smule, you are not alone. Organized harassment, impersonation, and smear campaigns are real threats. The problem isn’t the victim—it’s the platform that refuses to protect its community.

Minggu, 23 November 2025

Siaran Pers: Liu Goddess Flower Rilis 11 Lagu Baru di YouTube — Koleksi Suara Mistis dan Puitis

Reportase Eksklusif: 11 Karya Terbaru Liu Goddess Flower yang Menggema di YouTube

Reportase Eksklusif: 11 Karya Terbaru Liu Goddess Flower Menggema di YouTube

Oleh: Reporter Seni & Budaya

Sebagai wartawan yang telah lama mengikuti perkembangan dunia seni dan musik independen, hari ini saya mendapat kesempatan langka untuk menyaksikan kemunculan kembali seorang musisi sekaligus sosok artistik yang semakin diperhitungkan: Liu Goddess Flower. Ia bukan hanya sekadar penyanyi atau komposer, melainkan fenomena artistik yang menyatukan elemen mistis, kehalusan emosional, dan estetika alam dalam setiap karyanya.

Dalam beberapa minggu terakhir, Liu Goddess Flower merilis 11 karya terbaru di kanal YouTube resminya. Kesebelas lagu ini tidak hanya memperluas perjalanan musikalnya, tetapi juga memperlihatkan betapa tajam insting artistik dan kekuatan emosional yang selalu menjadi ciri khasnya. Sebagai jurnalis, saya bisa merasakan bagaimana karya-karya ini dibuat bukan untuk sekadar didengar, tetapi untuk dialami.

11 Lagu yang Membentuk Semesta Baru Liu Goddess Flower

1. Lagu 1

Karya pembuka ini terasa seperti pintu menuju dunia yang hanya bisa dibangun oleh seorang seniman yang benar-benar memahami kepekaan batin. Atmosfernya lembut namun memiliki kekuatan emosional yang besar.

2. Lagu 2

Di lagu kedua, Liu Goddess Flower menampilkan sisi spiritualnya yang lebih dalam. Nuansa harmoni dan pemilihan melodi seakan menegaskan identitas musikalnya yang elegan.

3. Lagu 3

Dengan gaya lembut yang menjadi ciri khasnya, lagu ini membawa saya pada pengalaman mendengarkan yang penuh refleksi. Ada aura mitologi dalam setiap nada.

4. Lagu 4

Sebuah karya dengan lapisan emosional yang lebih kelam namun tetap indah. Liu Goddess Flower seolah mengajak pendengar masuk ke dalam cerita hatinya yang paling rahasia.

5. Lagu 5

Melodi di lagu ini sangat cinematic, layaknya original soundtrack untuk film fantasi wuxia. Tekstur suara vokal dan instrumen terasa luar biasa harmonis.

6. Lagu 6

Komposisi vokalnya halus, namun intensitas emosinya tidak pernah turun. Lagu ini menunjukkan kontrol artistik yang matang.

7. Lagu 7

Di sini Liu Goddess Flower tampil lebih eksperimental, namun tetap mempertahankan estetika mistis yang membuat setiap lagunya mudah dikenali.

8. Lagu 8

Sebuah perjalanan keindahan yang dibangun dengan struktur musik yang rapi dan vokal yang menyentuh. Atmosfernya memancar lembut seperti cahaya dini hari.

9. Lagu 9

Hal yang paling menonjol dari karya ini adalah kejujuran emosionalnya. Liu Goddess Flower menunjukkan bagaimana ia menghadirkan rasa tanpa berlebihan.

10. Lagu 10

Nuansa epik terasa sejak awal. Lagu ini seolah menjadi jembatan menuju klimaks perjalanan musikal dari keseluruhan rangkaian karya.

11. Lagu 11

Penutup yang sangat kuat. Dengan sentuhan spiritual dan kelembutan vokal yang khas, lagu ini meninggalkan gema emosional yang lama bertahan.

Kesimpulan: Seorang Artist yang Layak Dirayakan

Melalui kesebelas karya ini, saya sebagai wartawan dapat menegaskan bahwa Liu Goddess Flower bukan hanya terus berkembang, tetapi juga telah mencapai fase artistik yang lebih matang dan memukau. Ia mampu menyampaikan kesedihan, kemistikan, keheningan, dan keindahan dalam bentuk yang autentik dan elegan.

Dengan rilisnya 11 lagu ini di YouTube, dunia kini memiliki kesempatan lebih luas untuk mengenal seorang artist yang pantas mendapatkan perhatian global. Liu Goddess Flower adalah bukti bahwa seni yang dibuat dengan ketulusan akan selalu menemukan jalannya ke hati pendengar.

Minggu, 09 November 2025

Honest TikTok review: Why I'm giving 1 star and uninstalling this controversial social media app

Why I'm Giving TikTok 1 Star - An Honest Review | Your Blog Name

Why I'm Giving TikTok 1 Star: An Honest Review After 2 Years of Use

|
1/5 Stars

My TikTok Experience: From Entertainment to Concern

After using TikTok extensively for 2 years, I've decided to uninstall the app and give it the lowest possible rating. Here's my comprehensive review explaining why.

Why TikTok Gets 1 Star From Me:

  • Algorithm Promotes Inappropriate Content: The "For You" page consistently shows sexually suggestive dances and revealing content
  • Poor Content Moderation: Despite reports, inappropriate content remains accessible to all ages
  • Addictive Design: Infinite scrolling and personalized content create unhealthy usage patterns
  • Data Privacy Concerns: Numerous reports about data collection and security issues
  • Negative Impact on Mental Health: Promotes unrealistic beauty standards and comparison culture

Quick Overview:

Pros: Creative filters, good music integration, some educational content

Cons: Poor content moderation, addictive design, privacy concerns, inappropriate content

Content Moderation Issues

As a sensitive individual, I found TikTok's content moderation severely lacking. The platform allows content that would be restricted on other platforms, and the reporting system seems ineffective.

Comparison with Other Platforms

Unlike YouTube Shorts which has stricter content policies, TikTok appears to prioritize engagement over user safety and moral values.

Final Verdict

While TikTok has some entertaining aspects, the negative impacts on mental health, poor content moderation, and ethical concerns outweigh any benefits. I cannot recommend this app, especially for young users or those concerned about digital wellbeing.

Recommendation: Uninstall and find alternative platforms that better align with your values.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is TikTok safe for children?

Based on my experience, no. The content moderation is insufficient to protect young users from inappropriate content.

Are there better alternatives to TikTok?

Yes, platforms like YouTube Shorts generally have better content moderation, though each platform has its own issues.

This review represents my personal experience and opinion. Your experience may vary.

My Wikipedia Article Was Unfairly Deleted

Why Wikipedia Deleted My Article: A Cautionary Tale for Editors

Why Wikipedia Deleted My Article: A Cautionary Tale for Editors

Published on June 15, 2023 | Wikipedia Editing Experience

After spending hours crafting what I believed was a professional, well-researched Wikipedia article, I experienced the frustration of having it deleted under suspicious circumstances. Here's my story and what I learned about the potential pitfalls of Wikipedia's editing ecosystem.

The Editing Process and Technical Errors

I had been working on a Wikipedia article for several days, carefully compiling information from reliable sources and structuring it according to Wikipedia's guidelines. The content was original, properly cited, and met the notability criteria. However, when I tried to save my work, I encountered multiple error messages.

Each time I attempted to save, the system would throw a "Galat" (error in Indonesian) notification. I tried refreshing, using different browsers, and even waiting several hours between attempts, but the problem persisted. Little did I know that these technical issues were connected to something more troubling happening behind the scenes.

Note to fellow editors: If you're experiencing repeated save errors on Wikipedia, it might indicate that your article is being reviewed or reported by other users.

The Sudden Disappearance

After my final unsuccessful save attempt, I returned to check on my article only to find it had completely vanished from Wikipedia. There was no trace of the hours of work I had invested. Confused and frustrated, I began investigating what had happened.

Upon checking the article's history and deletion log, I discovered that my article had been reported - not once, but twice - by the same user. The first report had been canceled and replaced with a new one. Shortly after, another user had taken action to delete my article entirely.

The Suspicious Discovery

What happened next was even more surprising. While searching for my deleted article on Google, I found a mirror of my exact content on a university website. The timing and content match were too precise to be coincidental.

Through further investigation, I discovered that both the user who reported my article and the one who deleted it were students at that same university. This raised serious questions about their motives and whether this constituted coordinated behavior to remove competing content.

Even more concerning, I noticed that several articles with questionable quality remained on Wikipedia, including ones that used personal Instagram accounts as references or contained numerous external links to the same university's resources. These articles appeared to be protected by the same group of users.

The Quality Paradox

The most frustrating aspect of this experience was the stark contrast in content quality. My deleted article was professionally written, properly sourced, and met Wikipedia's standards, while the articles that remained were clearly lower in quality:

  • They used personal social media accounts as references
  • They contained excessive external links to specific websites
  • They showed clear signs of promotional content
  • They lacked the depth and proper structure of a quality Wikipedia entry

My article was still a work in progress with plans for additional content, but it was deleted before I could complete these improvements. Meanwhile, the substandard articles continue to exist on Wikipedia, seemingly protected by a group of editors with shared interests.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

This experience taught me several important lessons about Wikipedia editing:

  • Document everything: Keep copies of your work and take screenshots of the editing process.
  • Understand the community dynamics: Wikipedia has power users and groups that can influence content decisions.
  • Be prepared for disputes: Familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's dispute resolution processes.
  • Consider gradual development: Instead of creating a complete article at once, consider building it incrementally.

While Wikipedia remains an invaluable resource, my experience highlights potential vulnerabilities in its content moderation system. When editors with conflicting interests can coordinate to remove competing content while protecting their own lower-quality articles, it undermines the platform's integrity.

I hope sharing this story helps other editors navigate similar challenges and encourages Wikipedia to continue improving its systems to prevent such coordinated behavior.

Wikipedia Editing Content Deletion Online Communities Digital Ethics Content Moderation

© 2023 Wikipedia Editor Experience Blog. This article represents a personal experience and is not affiliated with Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation.

My Experience with Wikipedia Article Deletion: When One Report Erased My Work

My Experience with Wikipedia Article Deletion: When One Report Erased My Work

My Experience with Wikipedia Article Deletion: When One Report Erased My Work

By: Me | Date: November 9, 2025

Have you ever experienced editing a Wikipedia article, saving it multiple times, and suddenly seeing everything disappear? That’s exactly what happened to me. I spent hours writing, researching, and editing a well-structured article — only to face repeated errors while saving. Then, one day, the article was gone completely.

Strange Errors Before the Deletion

While I was editing, I kept getting strange error messages every time I tried to save. I didn’t think much of it at first — maybe just a temporary glitch. But later, I realized those “errors” might have been signs that something unusual was happening behind the scenes.

One User, Two Reports

After checking the Wikipedia logs, I discovered that only one person had reported my article — not once, but twice. The first report was canceled and replaced with a new one. What surprised me even more was that the same person who made the report also participated in the deletion process.

The Deleted Article Reappears Elsewhere

Out of curiosity, I searched my deleted Wikipedia article title on Google. To my shock, I found a mirror version of my article hosted on a university website. Strangely, that university was the same place where both the reporter and the deleter were studying. That made me wonder — was this just a coincidence, or something more?

Questionable Quality Control

What frustrates me most is that many low-quality articles filled with weak references and personal Instagram links are still safe on Wikipedia. Meanwhile, my article — complete with credible references and professional structure — was removed without a fair review. It made me question the transparency and fairness of Wikipedia’s editorial process.

Reflections on Wikipedia’s Editing Community

Wikipedia is a great platform for sharing knowledge, but my experience exposed how fragile the system can be. When personal bias or small groups control reporting and deletion, it can discourage sincere contributors who want to improve content quality. I still believe in the value of open knowledge — but also believe the process should be more transparent and balanced.

Conclusion

Having your work deleted on Wikipedia without a proper reason is disappointing. However, it also reminded me that even in open platforms, there are hidden networks and power dynamics. My story is a reminder that fairness and accountability should always matter — even in the world’s largest encyclopedia.


Keywords: Wikipedia deletion, editing error, article removed, Wikipedia report abuse, online editing experience

Selasa, 04 November 2025

The Man Who Lived in Darkness: Deconstructing the Life of a Reclusive Occultist


---

The Man Who Lived in Darkness: Deconstructing the Life of a Reclusive Occultist

In a house shrouded in perpetual darkness, devoid of electricity and running water since 2019, lives a 69-year-old man. To him, the modern world ended years ago. But within this self-imposed void thrives a different, more disturbing reality: a room perpetually hazy with incense smoke, a pot containing his own urine, bracelets woven from stolen funeral shroud ties, and a fury so profound it was unleashed when the ashes of his mother's remains were scattered in a river.

Who is this man? He is not a mere eccentric. Piecing together his history reveals the complex profile of a "Scholar-Occultist"—a man whose lifelong pursuit of esoteric power has been fueled by personal failure, familial privilege, and a bitter rejection of the conventional world.

The Original Wound: Exile from the Normal World

His story begins with a pivotal failure. At 17, his wealthy parents sent him to London for schooling. This opportunity crumbled when the institution sent him back, deemed a failure. This label of "stupidity" likely had less to do with intellect and more with a lifestyle of hedonism and a lack of discipline.

The generous allowance from his parents was not spent on education, but on parties, women, and gold. Yet, London, a city that closed its academic doors to him, opened another: the underground world of Western occultism. Here, he found his true curriculum. He likely gained access to rare grimoires and was exposed to ceremonial magic. This failure in the normal world seeded a deep resentment for conventional systems, and occultism offered him a path to feel uniquely powerful.

A Global Quest for Power: Synthesizing West and Africa

His knowledge did not stop in London. Clues point to a significant journey to Africa. This expedition is key to understanding the physical, visceral nature of his rituals. While Western occultism can be highly symbolic and theoretical, African traditions—such as Voodoo or Hoodoo—are known for their direct, potent practices involving physical elements: graveyard dirt, bodily relics, and blood offerings.

The fusion of these two knowledge systems created his unique and dangerous ritualistic blend. The intellectual framework from the West was combined with the "ingredients" learned from Africa. This explains his use of cremation ashes (relics believed to hold ancestral power), funeral shroud ties (objects with a direct connection to the realm of death), and his own bodily fluids.

The Engine of Obsession: Privilege and a Life Without Compromise

A consistent thread from his youth to his old age is that he never held a job. His financial independence stemmed entirely from his family's wealth. This privilege was the engine that allowed his obsessions to flourish:

· It funded his travels to London and Africa.

· It paid for rare books and ritual objects.

· It supported a lifetime of experimentation without the need to conform to societal demands like employment.

This life without compromise reinforced his belief that social rules did not apply to him. In his own reality, he was a sovereign king.

The Psychologist's Couch: Compensation Through Ritual

At its core, his entire existence is an act of compensation. Being expelled from school and labeled a failure created a deep narcissistic wound. His entire life since has been an attempt to prove his rejected world wrong.

By transforming himself into a powerful "sorcerer," he flipped the narrative of his failure. He was no longer the inadequate one; he was the one who had transcended worldly needs, a master of unseen laws that ordinary people could not comprehend. His extreme actions—living without utilities, hoarding ashes, stealing from the dead—are acts of defiance and self-validation. They are a scream into the void, proclaiming that he is "above" those who need light and clean water.

Conclusion: The Scholar, the Sorcerer, and the Threat

This 69-year-old man is not a simple village shaman. He is the product of:

1. An intellectual foundation in Western occultism from his youth.

2. Practical exploration of African spiritual traditions that provided ritual potency.

3. Unchecked financial privilege that enabled a lifetime of uncompromised experimentation.

4. A deep-seated psychological wound that fueled an obsession with power.

Now, his personal quest has escalated into a tangible threat to his community. Living without water and electricity is no longer a spiritual practice but a violation of his neighbors' right to basic public health and safety.

This story serves as a stark warning. It shows how a distorted search for identity, when funded by wealth and nursed by resentment for decades, can give birth to a darkness that is all too real. The problem is no longer a question of his magic, but of his utter refusal to exist within the most fundamental covenants of human civilization.

Minggu, 02 November 2025

2026 Chinese Zodiac Predictions: A Complete Guide for All Signs

2026 Chinese Zodiac Forecast – Visual Edition

2026 Chinese Zodiac Forecast – Visual Edition

🐀Rat

Career

Rats face choices requiring careful consideration. Patience and planning bring success.

Love

Deepen existing relationships and expect unexpected romantic opportunities.

Health

Focus on mental well-being; meditation and light exercise help manage stress.

Wealth

Avoid impulsive spending; budgeting ensures financial stability.

🐂Ox

Career

Steady progress and diligence lead to career stability and recognition.

Love

Stable relationships grow stronger; singles may meet compatible partners.

Health

Consistent routines and diet support physical and mental well-being.

Wealth

Moderate growth in income; focus on long-term stability.

🐅Tiger

Career

Exciting opportunities arise, but risk assessment is crucial.

Love

Dynamic love life; patience avoids misunderstandings.

Health

Stay active but avoid exhaustion from overcommitment.

Wealth

Financial rewards possible; prioritize long-term investments.

🐇Rabbit

Career

Steady growth; creativity and attention to detail bring recognition.

Love

Harmonious relationships flourish; singles meet meaningful partners.

Health

Maintain emotional balance through relaxation and leisure.

Wealth

Stable finances; avoid borrowing or risky ventures.

🐉Dragon

Career

Energy and inspiration drive leadership opportunities; maintain diplomacy.

Love

Passionate romantic life; communication deepens relationships.

Health

Manage stress carefully with a balanced routine.

Wealth

Career earnings improve; wise investments yield growth.

🐍Snake

Career

Opportunities for skill development; steady progress is achievable.

Love

Relationships improve with patience; trust builds lasting bonds.

Health

Regular exercise and mindful nutrition maintain energy.

Wealth

Financial gains are possible; caution required for investments.

🐎Horse

Career

New ventures and social opportunities abound; careful planning ensures success.

Love

Vibrant love life; singles meet partners during travel or events.

Health

Balance work and rest to avoid burnout; outdoor activities are beneficial.

Wealth

Income growth possible; wise financial decisions lead to stability.

🐐Goat

Career

Collaborative efforts and creativity bring rewards and recognition.

Love

Supportive relationships strengthen; shared activities form new bonds.

Health

Consistent health routines ensure well-being; avoid overindulgence.

Wealth

Financial stability achievable with discipline and careful spending.

🐒Monkey

Career

Challenges test adaptability; strategic planning helps achieve goals.

Love

Relationship dynamics require care; singles find romance through social or intellectual pursuits.

Health

Regular exercise and focus improve health; avoid overexertion.

Wealth

Financial management is key; prioritize saving and wise investments.

🐓Rooster

Career

Recognition and achievement are highlighted; patience and diplomacy strengthen relations.

Love

Communication strengthens bonds; singles meet potential partners through networking.

Health

Maintain calm routines; sleep and relaxation are important.

Wealth

Financial growth possible; careful investments recommended.

🐕Dog

Career

Opportunities mix with stability; adaptability helps navigate changes.

Love

Family and friendships provide strength; honesty and empathy improve harmony.

Health

Focus on preventive care and exercise; mental wellness is important.

Wealth

Financial planning is crucial; avoid unnecessary risks.

🐖Pig

Career

Growth and recognition in professional life; teamwork is advantageous.

Love

Love life flourishes; singles find opportunities, couples deepen connections.

Health

Maintain balance to avoid fatigue; focus on physical and emotional well-being.

Wealth

Positive year for finances; budget wisely and seize growth opportunities.

These forecasts are based on traditional Chinese zodiac interpretations for 2026 and are intended as guidance, not absolute certainty.

My Experience on Wikipedia and Content Appearing on Other Sites

My Experience on Wikipedia and Content Appearing on Other Sites

My Experience on Wikipedia and Content Appearing on Other Sites

Some time ago, I wrote an article on Wikipedia. The article was later deleted by Wikipedia, and when I tried to recreate or save changes, I kept encountering errors and could not save my work.

After that, I discovered that content similar or identical to my writing appeared on another website. Strangely, when the link was visited, it showed Error 500, meaning the copied version appeared in search results but could not be accessed by visitors normally.

Facts I Can Share

  • My original article on Wikipedia was deleted, and I could not save changes due to errors.
  • A copied version of my writing appeared on another website and was indexed by search engines.
  • When accessed directly, the copied page displayed Error 500.
  • There was an administrative connection between the reporting and deletion process on Wikipedia and the institution hosting the copied version, but I do not mention any individual, institution name, or article title here.

Evidence I Have

  • Screenshots of search results showing the copied content indexed.
  • Screenshots of Error 500 when trying to open the copied page.
  • Logs or error messages from Wikipedia.
  • Notes of the date and time of each check.

This evidence is kept privately for potential appeals or official action and is not published on the blog to maintain privacy and security.

Why This Matters

This issue is not just about visibility. It concerns copyright, information credibility, and potential conflicts of interest if those benefiting are connected to the deletion process. The spread of copied content without permission can cause the original work to lose control and create confusion for readers.

Recommended Safe Actions

  • Document all evidence privately and systematically.
  • Submit an appeal or request a review to Wikipedia and include proof of ownership such as prior versions or edit history.
  • Contact the administrator of the website that copied the content and request removal or proper attribution in a neutral and professional manner.
  • Consider copyright takedown notices or similar mechanisms applicable to the website's jurisdiction if copying without permission is confirmed.
  • Keep secure copies of your work as proof of ownership.
  • If necessary, consult a legal expert regarding copyright or defamation risks.

Conclusion

Mentioning specific individuals or institutions can carry legal risks even if the claims are true. Therefore, I choose to present verifiable facts, keep evidence private, and follow official channels to assert my rights. This approach protects legal safety while still raising awareness about digital plagiarism and my experience on Wikipedia.