Minggu, 09 November 2025

Honest TikTok review: Why I'm giving 1 star and uninstalling this controversial social media app

Why I'm Giving TikTok 1 Star - An Honest Review | Your Blog Name

Why I'm Giving TikTok 1 Star: An Honest Review After 2 Years of Use

|
1/5 Stars

My TikTok Experience: From Entertainment to Concern

After using TikTok extensively for 2 years, I've decided to uninstall the app and give it the lowest possible rating. Here's my comprehensive review explaining why.

Why TikTok Gets 1 Star From Me:

  • Algorithm Promotes Inappropriate Content: The "For You" page consistently shows sexually suggestive dances and revealing content
  • Poor Content Moderation: Despite reports, inappropriate content remains accessible to all ages
  • Addictive Design: Infinite scrolling and personalized content create unhealthy usage patterns
  • Data Privacy Concerns: Numerous reports about data collection and security issues
  • Negative Impact on Mental Health: Promotes unrealistic beauty standards and comparison culture

Quick Overview:

Pros: Creative filters, good music integration, some educational content

Cons: Poor content moderation, addictive design, privacy concerns, inappropriate content

Content Moderation Issues

As a sensitive individual, I found TikTok's content moderation severely lacking. The platform allows content that would be restricted on other platforms, and the reporting system seems ineffective.

Comparison with Other Platforms

Unlike YouTube Shorts which has stricter content policies, TikTok appears to prioritize engagement over user safety and moral values.

Final Verdict

While TikTok has some entertaining aspects, the negative impacts on mental health, poor content moderation, and ethical concerns outweigh any benefits. I cannot recommend this app, especially for young users or those concerned about digital wellbeing.

Recommendation: Uninstall and find alternative platforms that better align with your values.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is TikTok safe for children?

Based on my experience, no. The content moderation is insufficient to protect young users from inappropriate content.

Are there better alternatives to TikTok?

Yes, platforms like YouTube Shorts generally have better content moderation, though each platform has its own issues.

This review represents my personal experience and opinion. Your experience may vary.

My Wikipedia Article Was Unfairly Deleted

Why Wikipedia Deleted My Article: A Cautionary Tale for Editors

Why Wikipedia Deleted My Article: A Cautionary Tale for Editors

Published on June 15, 2023 | Wikipedia Editing Experience

After spending hours crafting what I believed was a professional, well-researched Wikipedia article, I experienced the frustration of having it deleted under suspicious circumstances. Here's my story and what I learned about the potential pitfalls of Wikipedia's editing ecosystem.

The Editing Process and Technical Errors

I had been working on a Wikipedia article for several days, carefully compiling information from reliable sources and structuring it according to Wikipedia's guidelines. The content was original, properly cited, and met the notability criteria. However, when I tried to save my work, I encountered multiple error messages.

Each time I attempted to save, the system would throw a "Galat" (error in Indonesian) notification. I tried refreshing, using different browsers, and even waiting several hours between attempts, but the problem persisted. Little did I know that these technical issues were connected to something more troubling happening behind the scenes.

Note to fellow editors: If you're experiencing repeated save errors on Wikipedia, it might indicate that your article is being reviewed or reported by other users.

The Sudden Disappearance

After my final unsuccessful save attempt, I returned to check on my article only to find it had completely vanished from Wikipedia. There was no trace of the hours of work I had invested. Confused and frustrated, I began investigating what had happened.

Upon checking the article's history and deletion log, I discovered that my article had been reported - not once, but twice - by the same user. The first report had been canceled and replaced with a new one. Shortly after, another user had taken action to delete my article entirely.

The Suspicious Discovery

What happened next was even more surprising. While searching for my deleted article on Google, I found a mirror of my exact content on a university website. The timing and content match were too precise to be coincidental.

Through further investigation, I discovered that both the user who reported my article and the one who deleted it were students at that same university. This raised serious questions about their motives and whether this constituted coordinated behavior to remove competing content.

Even more concerning, I noticed that several articles with questionable quality remained on Wikipedia, including ones that used personal Instagram accounts as references or contained numerous external links to the same university's resources. These articles appeared to be protected by the same group of users.

The Quality Paradox

The most frustrating aspect of this experience was the stark contrast in content quality. My deleted article was professionally written, properly sourced, and met Wikipedia's standards, while the articles that remained were clearly lower in quality:

  • They used personal social media accounts as references
  • They contained excessive external links to specific websites
  • They showed clear signs of promotional content
  • They lacked the depth and proper structure of a quality Wikipedia entry

My article was still a work in progress with plans for additional content, but it was deleted before I could complete these improvements. Meanwhile, the substandard articles continue to exist on Wikipedia, seemingly protected by a group of editors with shared interests.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

This experience taught me several important lessons about Wikipedia editing:

  • Document everything: Keep copies of your work and take screenshots of the editing process.
  • Understand the community dynamics: Wikipedia has power users and groups that can influence content decisions.
  • Be prepared for disputes: Familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's dispute resolution processes.
  • Consider gradual development: Instead of creating a complete article at once, consider building it incrementally.

While Wikipedia remains an invaluable resource, my experience highlights potential vulnerabilities in its content moderation system. When editors with conflicting interests can coordinate to remove competing content while protecting their own lower-quality articles, it undermines the platform's integrity.

I hope sharing this story helps other editors navigate similar challenges and encourages Wikipedia to continue improving its systems to prevent such coordinated behavior.

Wikipedia Editing Content Deletion Online Communities Digital Ethics Content Moderation

© 2023 Wikipedia Editor Experience Blog. This article represents a personal experience and is not affiliated with Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation.

My Experience with Wikipedia Article Deletion: When One Report Erased My Work

My Experience with Wikipedia Article Deletion: When One Report Erased My Work

My Experience with Wikipedia Article Deletion: When One Report Erased My Work

By: Me | Date: November 9, 2025

Have you ever experienced editing a Wikipedia article, saving it multiple times, and suddenly seeing everything disappear? That’s exactly what happened to me. I spent hours writing, researching, and editing a well-structured article — only to face repeated errors while saving. Then, one day, the article was gone completely.

Strange Errors Before the Deletion

While I was editing, I kept getting strange error messages every time I tried to save. I didn’t think much of it at first — maybe just a temporary glitch. But later, I realized those “errors” might have been signs that something unusual was happening behind the scenes.

One User, Two Reports

After checking the Wikipedia logs, I discovered that only one person had reported my article — not once, but twice. The first report was canceled and replaced with a new one. What surprised me even more was that the same person who made the report also participated in the deletion process.

The Deleted Article Reappears Elsewhere

Out of curiosity, I searched my deleted Wikipedia article title on Google. To my shock, I found a mirror version of my article hosted on a university website. Strangely, that university was the same place where both the reporter and the deleter were studying. That made me wonder — was this just a coincidence, or something more?

Questionable Quality Control

What frustrates me most is that many low-quality articles filled with weak references and personal Instagram links are still safe on Wikipedia. Meanwhile, my article — complete with credible references and professional structure — was removed without a fair review. It made me question the transparency and fairness of Wikipedia’s editorial process.

Reflections on Wikipedia’s Editing Community

Wikipedia is a great platform for sharing knowledge, but my experience exposed how fragile the system can be. When personal bias or small groups control reporting and deletion, it can discourage sincere contributors who want to improve content quality. I still believe in the value of open knowledge — but also believe the process should be more transparent and balanced.

Conclusion

Having your work deleted on Wikipedia without a proper reason is disappointing. However, it also reminded me that even in open platforms, there are hidden networks and power dynamics. My story is a reminder that fairness and accountability should always matter — even in the world’s largest encyclopedia.


Keywords: Wikipedia deletion, editing error, article removed, Wikipedia report abuse, online editing experience

Selasa, 04 November 2025

The Man Who Lived in Darkness: Deconstructing the Life of a Reclusive Occultist


---

The Man Who Lived in Darkness: Deconstructing the Life of a Reclusive Occultist

In a house shrouded in perpetual darkness, devoid of electricity and running water since 2019, lives a 69-year-old man. To him, the modern world ended years ago. But within this self-imposed void thrives a different, more disturbing reality: a room perpetually hazy with incense smoke, a pot containing his own urine, bracelets woven from stolen funeral shroud ties, and a fury so profound it was unleashed when the ashes of his mother's remains were scattered in a river.

Who is this man? He is not a mere eccentric. Piecing together his history reveals the complex profile of a "Scholar-Occultist"—a man whose lifelong pursuit of esoteric power has been fueled by personal failure, familial privilege, and a bitter rejection of the conventional world.

The Original Wound: Exile from the Normal World

His story begins with a pivotal failure. At 17, his wealthy parents sent him to London for schooling. This opportunity crumbled when the institution sent him back, deemed a failure. This label of "stupidity" likely had less to do with intellect and more with a lifestyle of hedonism and a lack of discipline.

The generous allowance from his parents was not spent on education, but on parties, women, and gold. Yet, London, a city that closed its academic doors to him, opened another: the underground world of Western occultism. Here, he found his true curriculum. He likely gained access to rare grimoires and was exposed to ceremonial magic. This failure in the normal world seeded a deep resentment for conventional systems, and occultism offered him a path to feel uniquely powerful.

A Global Quest for Power: Synthesizing West and Africa

His knowledge did not stop in London. Clues point to a significant journey to Africa. This expedition is key to understanding the physical, visceral nature of his rituals. While Western occultism can be highly symbolic and theoretical, African traditions—such as Voodoo or Hoodoo—are known for their direct, potent practices involving physical elements: graveyard dirt, bodily relics, and blood offerings.

The fusion of these two knowledge systems created his unique and dangerous ritualistic blend. The intellectual framework from the West was combined with the "ingredients" learned from Africa. This explains his use of cremation ashes (relics believed to hold ancestral power), funeral shroud ties (objects with a direct connection to the realm of death), and his own bodily fluids.

The Engine of Obsession: Privilege and a Life Without Compromise

A consistent thread from his youth to his old age is that he never held a job. His financial independence stemmed entirely from his family's wealth. This privilege was the engine that allowed his obsessions to flourish:

· It funded his travels to London and Africa.

· It paid for rare books and ritual objects.

· It supported a lifetime of experimentation without the need to conform to societal demands like employment.

This life without compromise reinforced his belief that social rules did not apply to him. In his own reality, he was a sovereign king.

The Psychologist's Couch: Compensation Through Ritual

At its core, his entire existence is an act of compensation. Being expelled from school and labeled a failure created a deep narcissistic wound. His entire life since has been an attempt to prove his rejected world wrong.

By transforming himself into a powerful "sorcerer," he flipped the narrative of his failure. He was no longer the inadequate one; he was the one who had transcended worldly needs, a master of unseen laws that ordinary people could not comprehend. His extreme actions—living without utilities, hoarding ashes, stealing from the dead—are acts of defiance and self-validation. They are a scream into the void, proclaiming that he is "above" those who need light and clean water.

Conclusion: The Scholar, the Sorcerer, and the Threat

This 69-year-old man is not a simple village shaman. He is the product of:

1. An intellectual foundation in Western occultism from his youth.

2. Practical exploration of African spiritual traditions that provided ritual potency.

3. Unchecked financial privilege that enabled a lifetime of uncompromised experimentation.

4. A deep-seated psychological wound that fueled an obsession with power.

Now, his personal quest has escalated into a tangible threat to his community. Living without water and electricity is no longer a spiritual practice but a violation of his neighbors' right to basic public health and safety.

This story serves as a stark warning. It shows how a distorted search for identity, when funded by wealth and nursed by resentment for decades, can give birth to a darkness that is all too real. The problem is no longer a question of his magic, but of his utter refusal to exist within the most fundamental covenants of human civilization.

Minggu, 02 November 2025

2026 Chinese Zodiac Predictions: A Complete Guide for All Signs

2026 Chinese Zodiac Forecast – Visual Edition

2026 Chinese Zodiac Forecast – Visual Edition

🐀Rat

Career

Rats face choices requiring careful consideration. Patience and planning bring success.

Love

Deepen existing relationships and expect unexpected romantic opportunities.

Health

Focus on mental well-being; meditation and light exercise help manage stress.

Wealth

Avoid impulsive spending; budgeting ensures financial stability.

🐂Ox

Career

Steady progress and diligence lead to career stability and recognition.

Love

Stable relationships grow stronger; singles may meet compatible partners.

Health

Consistent routines and diet support physical and mental well-being.

Wealth

Moderate growth in income; focus on long-term stability.

🐅Tiger

Career

Exciting opportunities arise, but risk assessment is crucial.

Love

Dynamic love life; patience avoids misunderstandings.

Health

Stay active but avoid exhaustion from overcommitment.

Wealth

Financial rewards possible; prioritize long-term investments.

🐇Rabbit

Career

Steady growth; creativity and attention to detail bring recognition.

Love

Harmonious relationships flourish; singles meet meaningful partners.

Health

Maintain emotional balance through relaxation and leisure.

Wealth

Stable finances; avoid borrowing or risky ventures.

🐉Dragon

Career

Energy and inspiration drive leadership opportunities; maintain diplomacy.

Love

Passionate romantic life; communication deepens relationships.

Health

Manage stress carefully with a balanced routine.

Wealth

Career earnings improve; wise investments yield growth.

🐍Snake

Career

Opportunities for skill development; steady progress is achievable.

Love

Relationships improve with patience; trust builds lasting bonds.

Health

Regular exercise and mindful nutrition maintain energy.

Wealth

Financial gains are possible; caution required for investments.

🐎Horse

Career

New ventures and social opportunities abound; careful planning ensures success.

Love

Vibrant love life; singles meet partners during travel or events.

Health

Balance work and rest to avoid burnout; outdoor activities are beneficial.

Wealth

Income growth possible; wise financial decisions lead to stability.

🐐Goat

Career

Collaborative efforts and creativity bring rewards and recognition.

Love

Supportive relationships strengthen; shared activities form new bonds.

Health

Consistent health routines ensure well-being; avoid overindulgence.

Wealth

Financial stability achievable with discipline and careful spending.

🐒Monkey

Career

Challenges test adaptability; strategic planning helps achieve goals.

Love

Relationship dynamics require care; singles find romance through social or intellectual pursuits.

Health

Regular exercise and focus improve health; avoid overexertion.

Wealth

Financial management is key; prioritize saving and wise investments.

🐓Rooster

Career

Recognition and achievement are highlighted; patience and diplomacy strengthen relations.

Love

Communication strengthens bonds; singles meet potential partners through networking.

Health

Maintain calm routines; sleep and relaxation are important.

Wealth

Financial growth possible; careful investments recommended.

🐕Dog

Career

Opportunities mix with stability; adaptability helps navigate changes.

Love

Family and friendships provide strength; honesty and empathy improve harmony.

Health

Focus on preventive care and exercise; mental wellness is important.

Wealth

Financial planning is crucial; avoid unnecessary risks.

🐖Pig

Career

Growth and recognition in professional life; teamwork is advantageous.

Love

Love life flourishes; singles find opportunities, couples deepen connections.

Health

Maintain balance to avoid fatigue; focus on physical and emotional well-being.

Wealth

Positive year for finances; budget wisely and seize growth opportunities.

These forecasts are based on traditional Chinese zodiac interpretations for 2026 and are intended as guidance, not absolute certainty.

My Experience on Wikipedia and Content Appearing on Other Sites

My Experience on Wikipedia and Content Appearing on Other Sites

My Experience on Wikipedia and Content Appearing on Other Sites

Some time ago, I wrote an article on Wikipedia. The article was later deleted by Wikipedia, and when I tried to recreate or save changes, I kept encountering errors and could not save my work.

After that, I discovered that content similar or identical to my writing appeared on another website. Strangely, when the link was visited, it showed Error 500, meaning the copied version appeared in search results but could not be accessed by visitors normally.

Facts I Can Share

  • My original article on Wikipedia was deleted, and I could not save changes due to errors.
  • A copied version of my writing appeared on another website and was indexed by search engines.
  • When accessed directly, the copied page displayed Error 500.
  • There was an administrative connection between the reporting and deletion process on Wikipedia and the institution hosting the copied version, but I do not mention any individual, institution name, or article title here.

Evidence I Have

  • Screenshots of search results showing the copied content indexed.
  • Screenshots of Error 500 when trying to open the copied page.
  • Logs or error messages from Wikipedia.
  • Notes of the date and time of each check.

This evidence is kept privately for potential appeals or official action and is not published on the blog to maintain privacy and security.

Why This Matters

This issue is not just about visibility. It concerns copyright, information credibility, and potential conflicts of interest if those benefiting are connected to the deletion process. The spread of copied content without permission can cause the original work to lose control and create confusion for readers.

Recommended Safe Actions

  • Document all evidence privately and systematically.
  • Submit an appeal or request a review to Wikipedia and include proof of ownership such as prior versions or edit history.
  • Contact the administrator of the website that copied the content and request removal or proper attribution in a neutral and professional manner.
  • Consider copyright takedown notices or similar mechanisms applicable to the website's jurisdiction if copying without permission is confirmed.
  • Keep secure copies of your work as proof of ownership.
  • If necessary, consult a legal expert regarding copyright or defamation risks.

Conclusion

Mentioning specific individuals or institutions can carry legal risks even if the claims are true. Therefore, I choose to present verifiable facts, keep evidence private, and follow official channels to assert my rights. This approach protects legal safety while still raising awareness about digital plagiarism and my experience on Wikipedia.

Warga Gempar, Penyihir Gelar Ritual Api Unggun Terbuka Selama Sebulan

Tarian Api Penyihir di Tengah Malam

Tarian Api Penyihir di Tengah Malam

Di sebuah kota yang biasanya tenang, muncul sosok yang membuat warga gemetar. Seorang penyihir menyalakan api unggun hampir setiap hari, dari pagi hingga jam 3 dini hari. Selama sebulan penuh, ritual ini berlangsung di area terbuka, membuat warga panik dan memanggil pemadam kebakaran ketika kobaran api mulai membesar.

Kesaksian Warga

“Dia menatap api berjam-jam sambil memukul toples sebagai alat musik, kemudian menari di depannya. Kadang ia keluar ke jalan hotmix, seolah menantang siapa pun yang melihatnya,” – Warga setempat

Kobaran api yang dihasilkan seakan menyimpan bisikan entitas lain yang menunggu untuk dipanggil. Beberapa warga yang mencoba mendekat merasakan hawa dingin dan suara samar seperti bisikan dari dunia lain.

Pakar Fenomena Gaib

“Biasanya, orang yang memanggil entitas lain melakukannya secara sembunyi-sembunyi. Terbuka seperti ini sangat berisiko dan bisa menjadi magnet energi gaib yang sangat kuat,” – Pakar fenomena supranatural

Keberanian penyihir ini menunjukkan seolah ia memiliki perlindungan dari ilmu tak terlihat. Bahkan kebakaran yang terjadi tidak menghentikannya dari melanjutkan ritualnya.

Reaksi Komunitas

Selama sebulan, ritual ini menjadi legenda kecil di kota tersebut. Banyak warga merasa takut, sebagian penasaran, tapi semua sepakat bahwa fenomena ini tidak bisa diabaikan. Warga dihimbau tetap waspada dan menjauh dari area ritual demi keselamatan.

Smule: A Platform That Honors the Dead and Forgets the Living

Smule: A Platform That Honors the Dead and Forgets the Living — Opinion

Smule: A Platform That Honors the Dead and Forgets the Living

Why Smule’s verification system celebrates ghosts instead of real artists.

Opinion • By Me

In a digital world that should celebrate creativity and activity, Smule has become a strange paradox. Many artist profiles that are no longer active—sometimes belonging to artists who have passed away—still wear the purple "verified" badge. Meanwhile, living independent artists who sing daily, interact with fans, and release original music find themselves without the same recognition.

Verification should be a straightforward signal of authenticity. For most platforms, the marker helps users identify official accounts and protects creators from impersonation. But when a verification system is frozen in time, its value erodes. A badge that points to a historical fact rather than current activity stops being a useful trust signal; instead it becomes a relic.

A system that stopped listening

Smule’s support response — that verification is no longer awarded and there is no application process — is short and final. That answer may avoid debate, but it raises a clear equity issue: if the platform is closed to new verification, why keep the badge at all? Why preserve an uneven legacy that favors accounts verified under different rules?

For independent creators who pour time and emotion into their profiles, the lack of opportunity is deeply frustrating. These are users who build communities, collaborate across borders, and introduce fresh talent. When a platform sidelines those contributors, it contradicts the stated goal of supporting creative expression.

"A dead account can’t sing duets, thank fans, or release new songs. Yet its badge remains—while the living are left unrecognized."

The credibility cost

Beyond individual disappointment, there is a credibility cost to Smule as a platform. Verification marks are shorthand for authenticity; when that shorthand stops making sense, trust in what the badge stands for weakens. Fans and users rely on visible cues to find reliable sources of music and community. When those signals are unreliable, everyone loses.

Platforms survive by evolving. Policies that were reasonable five years ago may not suit a growing and shifting creator base today. Refusing to revisit verification is effectively choosing a static archive over a living ecosystem—an odd choice for an app built around live singing and real-time interaction.

Fairness, transparency, and the way forward

What would a fairer approach look like? Smule could reopen verification with a transparent application process, clear requirements (such as linked official streaming profiles, MusicBrainz/Discogs entries, or distribution through recognized aggregators), and a path for re-evaluation. It could also introduce temporary verification markers for active creators that expire unless renewed—this would keep the badge meaningful and tied to ongoing activity.

At its core, this is about aligning incentives. If Smule wants to encourage active contribution, it should reward it. If it wants to preserve legacy profiles, it can do that without conflating legacy with current authenticity—two different categories can coexist without confusing users.

Conclusion

Smule remains a unique and powerful tool for singers around the world. But if the platform wants to continue being relevant to creators today, it must restore fairness and transparency to its verification system. Otherwise it risks becoming a museum of past voices while the living artists—the ones adding new songs, sparking conversations, and growing communities—sing on without recognition.

Jumat, 31 Oktober 2025

Wikipedia Sudah Ketinggalan Zaman untuk Orang Hidup

Wikipedia Sudah Ketinggalan Zaman untuk Orang Hidup

Wikipedia Sudah Ketinggalan Zaman untuk Orang Hidup

Dulu Wikipedia dianggap sebagai raja sumber informasi. Sekarang? Di era digital modern, Wikipedia sudah ketinggalan zaman. Platform ini tidak ramah untuk orang yang masih hidup, sementara orang yang sudah meninggal justru lebih mudah mendapatkan tempat—meski mereka tidak lagi hadir di dunia nyata.

Fenomena ini bukan sekadar teori. Banyak kreator konten, pengusaha, seniman, dan tokoh modern yang populer di dunia nyata tidak memiliki profil yang layak di Wikipedia. Sementara tokoh yang telah meninggal, bahkan yang tidak terlalu terkenal, sering punya artikel panjang dan lengkap.

1. Orang Hidup Selalu Jadi Sasaran “Sensor”

Artikel tentang orang hidup di Wikipedia kerap dipersoalkan, dipangkas, atau dihapus tanpa penjelasan jelas. Fakta yang valid pun mudah hilang.

  • Kreator digital, influencer, atau pengusaha muda populer sering tidak punya profil lengkap.
  • Artikel yang diterima biasanya singkat, dangkal, dan tidak mewakili prestasi nyata.
  • Hasilnya? Orang hidup sering terlihat terbatasi eksistensinya di dunia digital, padahal mereka populer di dunia nyata.

2. Orang Mati Lebih Diuntungkan

Orang yang sudah meninggal bebas dari risiko reputasi. Semua fakta, karier, dan pencapaian mereka mudah dipublikasikan dengan rinci.

  • Artikel orang mati sering lebih panjang dan lengkap dibanding orang hidup yang sama atau bahkan lebih populer.
  • Ini menunjukkan bias sistemik: Wikipedia lebih mirip arsip sejarah daripada cermin kehidupan modern.
  • Orang mati bisa “hidup kembali” secara digital, sementara orang hidup berjuang untuk mempertahankan eksistensi mereka.

3. Wikipedia Tidak Fleksibel untuk Kehidupan Modern

Di era digital, orang hidup banyak berkarya melalui media sosial, platform digital, dan inovasi kreatif. Sayangnya, Wikipedia tidak mampu mengikuti ritme ini.

  • Popularitas di Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, atau platform digital lain sering dianggap tidak penting.
  • Tokoh yang aktif dan berpengaruh bisa tidak memiliki profil yang layak, meski jutaan orang mengenal mereka.
  • Informasi online modern sering dianggap kurang kredibel, sehingga artikel ditolak.

4. Dampak Nyata bagi Individu

  • Kesulitan membangun reputasi online: Orang ingin dikenal profesional atau publik sulit tampil karena Wikipedia dianggap kredibel.
  • Kesenjangan antara popularitas nyata dan digital: Seseorang bisa populer di media sosial tapi tidak terlihat di Wikipedia.
  • Hilangnya sejarah hidup digital: Generasi aktif di dunia modern bisa kehilangan jejak mereka di arsip sejarah online.

5. Pelajaran Penting

  • Platform ini lebih cocok sebagai arsip sejarah, bukan sebagai cermin kehidupan modern.
  • Kehidupan digital dan pencapaian orang hidup sering tidak diakui sepenuhnya.
  • Individu dan komunitas harus mencari alternatif lain: situs resmi, arsip digital pribadi, atau platform media sosial.

Kesimpulan

Wikipedia sudah tidak relevan untuk orang hidup. Sistemnya lebih mengutamakan orang yang sudah meninggal, sementara individu aktif di dunia nyata sering diabaikan atau dipersulit.

Di era informasi modern, mengandalkan Wikipedia untuk mencerminkan dunia nyata adalah langkah ketinggalan zaman. Orang hidup, pencipta, inovator, dan tokoh modern membutuhkan ruang digital lain yang fleksibel, dinamis, dan akurat. Wikipedia bisa menjadi referensi tambahan, tapi tidak bisa menjadi satu-satunya tempat untuk membangun eksistensi digital seseorang.

Ketika Passion Menjadi Sasaran Bullying Online

Ketika Passion Menjadi Sasaran Bullying Online

Ketika Passion Menjadi Sasaran Bullying Online

Bermain dan belajar di dunia musik online terlihat menyenangkan, tapi pengalaman pribadiku mengajarkanku bahwa tidak semua interaksi digital aman.

Awal Kenalan dengan Penggemar Musik

Aku mulai mengenal seorang pria tua dari Indonesia yang sering meminta aku membuat minus one lagu-lagu langka. Aku membuatnya dengan senang hati, berpuluh-puluh minus one, kemudian menyanyikannya sambil berbagi di platform musik. Kami saling chatting di direct message dan awalnya terasa normal.

Berbagi Tips Nyanyi yang Disalahartikan

Suatu kali dia menanyakan bagaimana caraku belajar nyanyi dengan mudah. Aku berbagi teknik yang aku gunakan: memakai dua HP dan dua earphone, satu HP plus earphone plus mic untuk musik Smule di telinga kiri, dan satu HP plus earphone untuk mendengar penyanyi asli di telinga kanan. Sayangnya, informasi ini kemudian disalahartikan dan menjadi bahan gosip.

Fitnah dan Bullying

Setelah aku menolak undangan bertemu di restoran yang dia tunjuk, perilakunya berubah menjadi menyudutkan. Beberapa bentuk bullying yang aku alami antara lain:

  • Menyatakan cara belajarku mustahil dan meragukan teknikku.
  • Menyatakan nyanyian Mandarin-ku tidak jelas, meski aku berlatih dengan sungguh-sungguh.
  • Mengaitkan prestasiku dengan penampilan fisik, menyatakan aku pantas juara karena "cantik", padahal dia tidak pernah melihat wajahku.
  • Menyatakan usiaku sama dengannya hanya karena aku bisa menyanyikan banyak lagu lama.
  • Meragukan kemampuan membaca dan menulis Mandarin-ku.
Semua komentar dan tuduhan ini merupakan bentuk bullying digital dan fitnah yang membuatku sadar bahwa berbagi pengalaman atau kemampuan di dunia online bisa menjadi sasaran orang yang tidak menghargai usaha orang lain.

Pelajaran dari Pengalaman Ini

Pengalaman ini mengajarkanku beberapa hal penting:

  • Berhati-hati dalam berbagi informasi pribadi atau teknik: meski niat baik, tetap bisa disalahartikan.
  • Fokus pada kualitas diri sendiri: jangan terlalu dipengaruhi penilaian orang yang salah memahami atau iri.
  • Jaga kesehatan mental: karena bullying digital bisa sangat melelahkan secara emosional.
  • Kesadaran bahwa tidak semua orang menghargai prestasi kita: tapi itu tidak mengurangi nilai diri kita.

Aku menulis kisah ini bukan untuk menuding siapa pun secara pribadi, tetapi untuk berbagi pengalaman nyata bahwa berbagi passion online juga bisa menghadirkan risiko. Kesadaran dan kewaspadaan adalah kunci untuk tetap aman dan percaya diri di dunia digital.